Pro-life advocates consider the fetus a person right at conception once the sperm fertilizes the egg. This personhood argument makes it so that those women who are having abortions are killing the fetus. Those arguing against abortion also make the argument that it is often being utilized as a form of contraception when there are multiple other forms of effective contraception.
They would also argue that other options are available for pregnant women such as adoption. This would save the life of the baby and provide families who have been unable to have a child with a baby of their own. The woman would be able to turn a difficult situation into an opportunity to help a family in need. Detractors of abortion often cite practical reasons such as medical or psychological consequences of having an abortion, which, for the most part, have been proven untrue.
They argue that abortion can be an unsafe procedure which can result in numerous complications affecting the fertility of the woman for the rest of her life. They also argue that abortions can cause psychological distress in women who have them.
The guilt associated with the act and thoughts of destroying their baby can make it difficult for them to function. This can lead to mental illness such as depression or anxiety which can be debilitating. Young women often have abortions in order not to have their future compromised by the responsibility of having children. However, the guilt associated with having an abortion can impact these young women for the rest of their lives.
Multiple factors impact the issue of abortion such as religious, legal and moral concerns which lean individuals in favor or against the issue.
Religious views against abortion are that committing abortions go against God. This is not only because it violates the seventh commandment which states that murder is against the laws of God.
Other religious views are that ending a pregnancy is acting as God since he is the only one that can make a decision to take a life. However, often religious individuals are also against contraception so their perceived solution to the problem is that individuals only have sex for procreation which is unrealistic. One recent example of moral attacks against abortion is the late-term abortion debate.
Opponents argue this is murder because the child has a heartbeat and a chance for survival outside the womb. Moral concerns of abortion revolve around the morality of limiting the civil rights of women but also around ending pregnancies due to the possibility of disabilities such as downs syndrome occurring in the baby. By not allowing a woman to control her body is denying her rights. However, the situation is complicated and is unique to women as men do not ever have to make that decision about their body.
This is why it makes it easy for men, especially in legislative positions, to attempt to take away their right to choose. However, abortion often occurs when parents realize that their child may have a lifelong disability such as downs syndrome. In our current day and age, we realize that although downs syndrome can limit the ability of individuals with the disorder.
Increased scientific knowledge has also resulted in the ability of parents to predict the sex of their child early on in the pregnancy. This gender selection is immoral and is often used in foreign countries in which patriarchal countries where women are looked down upon. They deemed that abortions are protected rights which every woman has the right to make. Those who take into account legal factors will state that despite personal opinion every woman has been given the right by the highest law of the land to make their own decision.
They would argue that as long as an individual follows the laws set forth in each state about when a woman can have an abortion they are legally in their right to do so. Those who take into account legal reasons believe in a woman's right to choose in any situation. For example, the Texas restrictive abortion laws obey the letter of the law but place undue burdens on women seeking to terminate their pregnancy.
Few people believe in just the religious, moral or legal factors regarding an issue. Their views are often influenced by a combination of these factors. Therefore it is important to understand all of the various arguments that are contributed to the discussion. Both sides of the abortion debate need to be able to understand and take into account the views of the other side.
By doing so they can better inform their own argument. Individuals may also be swayed to the other side of the debate. Having the right to debate an issue is a fundamental right of living in our free society. The mother can receive government assistance to help her support the baby, and if all else fails, she can always give the baby up for adoption.
This rationale in quotes, is a product of a selfish mentality, which is probably the reason for the dilemma in the first place. She may be too young to care, but someone else isn't. And in another unlikely scenario, she may find that she is unable to care for the baby, but someone else isn't.
So, if it is going to disrupt your life so much that you'd rather not take care of the baby, have someone else do it for you. And you can't have it both ways; you can't decide that, oh but I don't want someone else to have my baby, especially at the expense of killing a life altogether. The notion that a mother's self-inflicted dilemma -- not that of killing the fetus or not, which is no dilemma, but the decision on whether she should derail her own fastidious plans, which probably won't go as planned after all, if history is any judge for her baby's sake, or give the baby up for adoption, is not an easy one, is true, however, it is entirely of her own doing.
Your point is formally deconstructed when we look at the real options, in real terms. Do we kill your aspirations or desires, or do we kill a life?
If there are very serious risks to the woman's health, an abortion could be justified on the grounds that you choose the lesser of two evils, that is, forsaking the unborn child to save the mother's life.
The baby's health is another question altogether. It's no doubt hard to make a decision for someone on whether or not their life is worth living, but I could see how a severe deformity might lead one to the route of abortion, justifiably. If we implant an embryo in a surrogate mother, then doesn't she have the right to abort the child, without regard for any preconceived agreements, because she has liberty over "her own body?
Unwanted pregnancies can be very stressful for women. Therefore, if they think they can not give their babies a good life then it is right for them to have abortions. But you interjected some new things. First you say that "an unwanted pregnancy can be very stressful. Driving in heavy traffic can be very stressful, but that doesn't give you the right to kill every driver and passenger of every car on the highway, or any for that matter.
Shortly after that, I was forced to wince as I read your subjective evaluation of what is a "good life. There are people living in Southeast DC, not more than 15 miles from where I live, who subsist on scraps, and sleep in degenerate buildings with basketball-sized rats, where the sound of gunshots is not at all foreign. Outside, they face the bereft reality that is rampant drug dealing, unconcealed crime and violence, and conditions that to anyone unaccustomed, would be untenable.
Yet still, they value their life. Rene-Thierry Magon de la Villehuchet, he was a french fund manager, one of thousands of victims of the now infamous Madoff Scandal. Why do I say he "was? He could have still maintained a quality of life that some people spend their whole life dreaming of. But in the end, he valued money more than his life. What life he had was not "good" enough for him. I make that comparison to show you the extreme difference of opinion on what makes a life worth living, that really, there is no way to determine for somone else, what is a "good life.
But suppose even that there is a gray area that "might" justify a woman getting an abortion. The abortion would not be "right. So leave it open for interpretation with a word like "might" "perhaps" "possibly" "could" etc. What I'm saying is that if the situation might have justified it Not only is that impossible to do objectively, it would be hard to do subjectively based on the variability of different health concerns, or risks. Therefore, take my advice and use a moderate word such as "might", "perhaps", etc.
For Stone, " death seriously harms the fetus and so the fetus has a right to life" Advocate means someone in support of. You've misused the word throughout your essay. Take that into consideration when you write your new essay. It seems that you manage to repeat the weakest, poorly articulated points in your argument a few more times.
In your conclusion, it seems you finally decide to throw the word "rape" into the mix as an afterthought. That would probably recur many times in the body, if not as early as the thesis, in a well written persuasive essay on either side of this topic, but even more so in support of abortion. As someone who does not have an expert grasp on the arguments, you need to stick to the more salient points such as rape, extreme deformities, serious health risks to the woman, etc.
Stick to those extenuating circumstances and you'll have a better chance of writing a good persuasive essay. I hardly addressed the conventions of good writing, choosing rather to focus on the content, but there is also much room for improvement in the intro, body, and conclusion. The intro has 2 major aspects. The opening sentence and thesis, both of which need improvement.
The body is simply your ability to expand on those points, and organize and coordinate your arguments. Your conclusion will summarize why your thesis is right, and memorably no less.
It will not include new ideas. First, women have the right to control their own bodies. If we know the child will be born with defects then there is no point in having the mother keep the baby if she chooses not to. Also advocates of abortion believe that abortion is seriously wrong but women should do what is best for them and their babies.
You have chosen an issue that evokes very strong emotional reactions on both sides as evidenced by Mustafa's comment, which was longer than your own essay. This doesn't mean that you should abandon the topic -- on the contrary, this is probably a sign that the topic is really worth writing about.
Nor does it mean that you cannot advance a strong pro-choice case. But, it does mean that you have a greater obligation than usual to deal with your opponent's arguments, and this is something your essay doesn't do at the moment. Most importantly, you completely ignore the main issue in the abortion debate. Your arguments are based upon a premise that the fetus is not a human life that your opponents don't accept.
In an argumentative research paper, you may choose to include a "call to action" in which you describe something that others can do if they agree with your argument. With so much evidence in support of [summarize your thesis], it is unrealistic to believe otherwise. It is important to document exactly where you found the information you used in your paper. Your references will often come from published sources including books, articles, other research papers and electronic sources such as web sites, e-books and audio or video media.
General Information about Creating a References Page: Abortion Essay Argumentative Back to all templates. Introduction Starting Sentence Option 1: Abortion is a fundamental right guaranteed by the constitution Roe vs. Experts with a variety of perspectives on abortion can be found in the following arenas:
Mar 19, · The Right To Have an Abortion Unwanted pregnancies can be very stressful for women. Whether or not women have the right to have abortions is a controversial subject. Opponents of abortions believe that abortion is seriously wrong. Killing a fetus is killing a person. However, women should be able to have abortions for .
Abortion: The silent scream of a modern holocaust - Humankind is constantly in search of answers about life. Where we come from, the purpose for life, while history is written day by day, minute by minute, carrying joys and burdens and preparing human destiny for .
Essay on Abortion. Essay on abortion What is abortion? An abortion is the medical process of ending a pregnancy so it does not result in the birth of a baby. It is also sometimes known as a 'termination' or a 'termination of pregnancy'. Today, abortion is a big issue concerning women because for years it had been said that abortion should not be legal. Many people feel aborting an unwanted child, or killing an unwanted child should be against the law.
Abortion refers to the termination of a pregnancy by removing or expelling the fetus or embryo from the uterus before it is ready for birth. There are two major forms of abortion: spontaneous, which is often referred to as a miscarriage or the purposeful abortion, which is often induced abortion. 1 Sample Essay #11 Abortion is the most controversial issue having no grounds of agreement among two polar aspects. The argument is life and death though.